Bond hearings determine whether a person waits out a legal case at home or behind bars, sometimes for many months. That difference affects families, jobs and the ability to help prepare a legal defense.
It's a court check-in where a judge decides if someone locked up can be released, sometimes after paying money, while their case plays out.
Critics say denying bond hearings to people held for prolonged periods raises Fifth Amendment due process concerns. Supporters counter that Congress has broad authority to set detention rules for noncitizens in removal proceedings.
An immigration judge considers whether the detainee poses a flight risk or danger to the community, along with ties to the U.S., criminal history and the strength of the immigration case.
If bond is granted, the detainee may be released after paying a set amount and agreeing to conditions such as check-ins or electronic monitoring. If denied, the person remains in detention while proceedings continue.
A look at the rules, oversight gaps, and policy debate behind health care for people in U.S. immigration custody.
Read the guide →Lawmakers are weighing whether to write binding medical-care rules for immigration detention into federal law, replacing agency-administered guidelines.
Read the brief →