Political Glossary

Reaganomics

Reaganomics refers to the economic policies pursued by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, centered on cutting marginal income tax rates, reducing federal regulation, restraining domestic spending growth and supporting tight monetary policy to curb inflation.

Economy
Updated Jun 16, 2026
1 linked survey
In plain English
Lower taxes and lighter rules for growth.

It's the nickname for Ronald Reagan's economic plan: lower taxes, fewer regulations and a focus on bringing down inflation, with the goal of speeding up growth.

Simple example
The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 cut the top marginal income tax rate from 70% to 50%, and the Tax Reform Act of 1986 lowered it further to 28% — the signature tax moves of Reaganomics.
Why it matters
What the term actually changes.
Template for tax debates

Reaganomics remains the reference point in modern arguments over whether cutting taxes on high earners and businesses boosts growth broadly or mainly benefits those at the top.

Shaped federal finances

The combination of tax cuts and higher defense spending under Reagan helped nearly triple the federal debt in the 1980s, framing ongoing debates about deficits.

Mixed scorecard

Inflation fell sharply and GDP grew about 3.5% a year on average, but economists disagree on how much credit belongs to tax policy versus Federal Reserve interest-rate decisions.

How it works
The mechanics, in practice.
Lower marginal rates

The top income tax rate was cut from 70% to 28% over Reagan's two terms, with supporters arguing lower rates increase the incentive to work, save and invest.

Deregulation and spending restraint

The administration eased federal regulation in sectors such as energy and finance and sought to slow the growth of non-defense domestic spending.

Tight money at the Fed

Reaganomics worked alongside Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker's high interest rates, which were aimed at breaking the double-digit inflation of the late 1970s.

You’ve learned the term. Now vote.
Did Reaganomics deliver on its promises?
Live results — 185 voters
Yes — it ignited sustained growth and tamed inflation37%
Mostly yes — strong on growth, mixed on debt and inequality11%
Mostly no — growth came at the cost of widening inequality and deficits28%
No — it concentrated wealth and never paid for itself24%
See how 185 Americans voted
Cast your vote to unlock the results
Anonymous · one vote per person