Issue Brief

Should states use independent redistricting commissions?

Some states allow independent commissions to draw voting district maps instead of elected politicians. Supporters say it reduces partisan bias. Critics argue it removes accountability from elected representatives.

Elections & Polling 5 min read Updated Jun 2026
The issue in plain English
Should states use independent redistricting commissions?

Supporters of independent commissions argue that elected officials should not control the district lines that help decide their own elections. Opponents argue that elected lawmakers are accountable to voters, while commission members may be harder to remove or challenge.

Why this matters
What the answer actually changes.
Policy outcomes

How this issue is resolved shapes the rules voters live under.

Representation

The arguments reveal who gets a stronger voice when the question is settled.

Trust

Whether the process feels fair influences how voters trust the outcome.

The arguments
Two sides of the debate.
The goal is not to decide for the voter. It is to make the strongest competing views easy to understand.
Supporters say
Independent commissions can reduce partisan control.

Supporters argue that politicians have a conflict of interest when they draw the districts they run in. Removing map-drawing from the legislature can lower the direct partisan influence on outcomes and increase public trust in the process.

Critics say
Commissions may reduce democratic accountability.

Critics argue commissions are not automatically neutral and may be harder for voters to hold responsible. Commission members may still have political bias, and the rules for appointing them can become political fights of their own.

Key facts
Numbers behind the question.
435
House districts

U.S. House of Representatives

10
Years between redraws

U.S. Census Bureau

14
States with independent or advisory commissions

Brennan Center 2024

Timeline
How the debate got here.
1810s
The original "Gerry-mander" — Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry signs a districting bill so partisan it gives the practice its name.
1962
Baker v. Carr establishes that federal courts can hear redistricting challenges, opening the door to "one person, one vote" rulings.
2000
Arizona voters create the first independent commission with map-drawing authority via ballot initiative.
2018
Michigan, Colorado, and Utah voters adopt independent redistricting commissions through ballot initiatives.
Context
How districts get drawn today

In most states, the state legislature draws congressional and state-legislative districts after each decennial census. A growing number of states have shifted this authority to independent or bipartisan commissions whose members are not sitting legislators.

Evidence
What the research shows

Studies of states like California, Arizona, and Michigan that have adopted independent commissions show some evidence of more competitive races, but the effects vary widely by state and commission design. The empirical record is genuinely mixed.

Continue exploring
Keep going.