Policy outcomes
How this issue is resolved shapes the rules voters live under.
The issue in plain English
Should the federal death penalty be abolished?
The federal death penalty, expanded by Congress in 1994, has been used sparingly but became newly prominent after 13 executions were carried out between July 2020 and January 2021. A 2021 Justice Department moratorium has paused federal executions pending review, while polling shows public support for capital punishment has declined from its 1990s peak even as a majority of Americans still favor it for murder.
Why this matters
What the answer actually changes.
Representation
The arguments reveal who gets a stronger voice when the question is settled.
Trust
Whether the process feels fair influences how voters trust the outcome.
The arguments
Two sides of the debate.
The goal is not to decide for the voter. It is to make the strongest competing views easy to understand.
Supporters say
The case for abolition
Opponents of the federal death penalty argue it carries an irreducible risk of executing innocent people. A 2014 study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences estimated that about 4% of defendants sentenced to death in the United States are likely innocent, and more than 190 death-row inmates nationwide have been exonerated since 1973, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Critics also point to research, including reports from the National Research Council, concluding that existing studies do not credibly demonstrate a deterrent effect beyond that of long prison sentences. Abolition supporters further cite disparities in how capital sentences are imposed, including by race of the defendant and victim and by geography, as well as the high cost of capital prosecutions compared with life imprisonment. They argue that the long appeals process prolongs uncertainty for victims' families, and note an international trend away from the practice, with most U.S. allies in Europe and Latin America having ended it. Declining public support — from a Gallup high of 80% in 1994 to about 53% in 2024 — is also presented as evidence of shifting norms.
Critics say
The case for keeping it
Supporters argue the federal death penalty is reserved for the most serious crimes — terrorism, mass murder, and the killing of federal officials or children — and that some offenses are so grave that execution is the only proportionate punishment. They point to cases such as the Oklahoma City and Boston Marathon bombings and the Charleston church shooting as examples in which juries chose death after extensive due process. Proponents contend the threat of capital punishment can incapacitate the worst offenders permanently and may deter terrorism and murders committed by inmates already serving life sentences. Defenders also note that federal capital cases include layers of review — automatic appeals, federal habeas corpus, and presidential clemency — that they argue minimize the risk of wrongful execution. They cite Gallup data showing a majority of Americans, about 53%, continue to support the death penalty for murder, and argue that abolition by executive moratorium or legislation would override jury verdicts in cases involving victims' families who sought the sentence. Many supporters favor reforms to procedure and protocol rather than ending the practice.
Key facts
Numbers behind the question.
~60
Federal crimes punishable by death after the 1994 Federal Death Penalty Act
Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994
13
Federal executions carried out from July 2020 to January 2021
U.S. Department of Justice
~4%
Estimated share of U.S. death-sentenced defendants who are likely innocent
Gross et al., PNAS (2014)
53%
Gallup-measured public support for the death penalty for murder in 2024, down from 80% in 1994
Gallup
Context
How the federal death penalty works today
Congress effectively reinstated the federal death penalty with the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994, which expanded the list of federal capital offenses to roughly 60 crimes, including terrorism, espionage, large-scale drug trafficking resulting in death, and certain murders. Federal capital cases are tried in U.S. district courts and, if a death sentence is imposed, carried out by the Bureau of Prisons, historically at the federal complex in Terre Haute, Indiana. Use of the federal death penalty has varied sharply by administration. The Trump administration resumed executions in 2020 after a 17-year hiatus, carrying out 13 in roughly six months — the most under any administration in more than a century. In July 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland imposed a moratorium pending a review of execution protocols, leaving roughly 40 inmates on federal death row but pausing further executions. At the state level, 27 states authorize capital punishment and 23 have abolished it as of 2024.
Evidence
What the data show
Empirical evidence on the death penalty is contested. The 2014 PNAS study by Samuel Gross and colleagues used statistical modeling of exonerations to estimate a 4.1% wrongful-conviction rate among death-sentenced defendants. Studies on deterrence have produced conflicting findings; a 2012 National Research Council review concluded that existing research is not informative about whether capital punishment deters homicide. Cost analyses by state agencies and academic researchers, including studies in California, Kansas and Nevada, have generally found capital cases more expensive than non-capital cases due to longer trials and appeals, though comparable federal-level cost data are limited. Public opinion has shifted: Gallup recorded 80% support for the death penalty for murder in 1994 and 53% in recent polling, with support falling further among younger respondents and when life without parole is offered as an alternative.
Continue exploring
Keep going.
Issue brief
Should the Electoral College Be Abolished?
Americans remain divided over whether to keep the constitutional system that has chosen presidents since 1789.
Issue brief
Did Reaganomics deliver on its promises?
Four decades on, the economic record of the Reagan era remains a contested benchmark in American policy debates.
Issue brief
Should Citizens United be overturned?
More than a decade after the Supreme Court reshaped campaign finance, Americans remain divided over whether the ruling should stand.
Issue brief
Should the federal minimum wage rise to $15 an hour?
Lawmakers and economists continue to debate whether more than doubling the $7.25 federal floor would lift workers out of poverty or cost jobs.