Domestic Policy · Live

Should AI development be subject to federal oversight?

0 votes 237 voting nowDemo data 16 days ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

In October 2023, President Biden signed Executive Order 14110, directing federal agencies to set safety, security, and reporting standards for advanced AI models; President Trump rescinded that order in January 2025.

The European Union's AI Act, which entered into force in August 2024, classifies AI systems by risk level and imposes binding obligations on providers of general-purpose and high-risk models.

The U.S. AI Safety Institute, housed within the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was established in 2023 to develop voluntary testing and evaluation guidelines for frontier AI models.

Supporters of federal oversight cite risks including algorithmic discrimination, deepfakes, and concentration of market power; opponents argue regulation could slow U.S. innovation and cede ground to Chinese AI development.

As of 2024, no comprehensive federal AI statute has passed Congress, though more than 30 states have enacted laws addressing specific AI uses such as election deepfakes, hiring algorithms, and generative content disclosure.

Cast your vote
Should AI development be subject to federal oversight?
Live
Live results — voters
Yes — establish a dedicated federal agency to license and audit advanced AI systems0%
Yes — but limit oversight to high-risk applications such as critical infrastructure and national security0%
No — rely on existing agencies and sector-specific rules already on the books0%
No — leave AI development to industry self-regulation and state-level laws0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Demo data
Once geographic aggregates ship, this section shows your state and the most dramatic agreement/disagreement around the country.
Virginia
55% Yes
Your state
Florida
51% No
leans opposite
Pennsylvania
53% Yes
close split
Michigan
57% Yes
strongest shift
Texas
54% No
disagrees
Georgia
50% Yes
nearly tied
Northeast
58% Yes
South
47% Yes
Midwest
54% Yes
West
61% Yes
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Live shifts
Demo data
Updating live
YES gained 4% nationally in the last hour as new votes surged from the Northeast.
1 hr
Florida flipped toward NO after trending narrowly YES earlier this afternoon.
18 min
1,248 new votes were submitted in the last 10 minutes.
Live
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Yes — establish a dedicated federal agency to license and audit advanced AI systems0%
Yes — but limit oversight to high-risk applications such as critical infrastructure and national security0%
No — rely on existing agencies and sector-specific rules already on the books0%
No — leave AI development to industry self-regulation and state-level laws0%