Immigration · Live

Should Congress significantly increase funding for immigration enforcement?

0 votes 237 voting nowDemo data 23 hrs ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

The U.S. Senate passed legislation providing the Department of Homeland Security approximately $70 billion in additional funding for immigration enforcement, sending the bill to the House.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement received roughly $9.4 billion in fiscal year 2024 appropriations, while Customs and Border Protection received approximately $19.8 billion.

U.S. Border Patrol recorded about 2.05 million Southwest border encounters in fiscal year 2023, declining to roughly 1.53 million in fiscal year 2024.

Supporters argue increased funding is necessary to expand detention capacity, hire agents, and deter unlawful crossings; critics argue funds would be better directed to immigration judges, with the courts facing a backlog exceeding 3 million pending cases.

Appropriations bills require a simple majority in both chambers of Congress and the president's signature, though Senate budget rules can require 60 votes to overcome a filibuster on non-reconciliation measures.

Cast your vote
Should Congress significantly increase funding for immigration enforcement?
Live
Live results — voters
Yes — expand ICE and Border Patrol funding to current proposed levels0%
Yes — but pair enforcement funding with legal immigration reforms0%
No — redirect funds toward asylum processing and immigration courts0%
No — current enforcement funding is already sufficient0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Demo data
Once geographic aggregates ship, this section shows your state and the most dramatic agreement/disagreement around the country.
Virginia
55% Yes
Your state
Florida
51% No
leans opposite
Pennsylvania
53% Yes
close split
Michigan
57% Yes
strongest shift
Texas
54% No
disagrees
Georgia
50% Yes
nearly tied
Northeast
58% Yes
South
47% Yes
Midwest
54% Yes
West
61% Yes
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Live shifts
Demo data
Updating live
YES gained 4% nationally in the last hour as new votes surged from the Northeast.
1 hr
Florida flipped toward NO after trending narrowly YES earlier this afternoon.
18 min
1,248 new votes were submitted in the last 10 minutes.
Live
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Yes — expand ICE and Border Patrol funding to current proposed levels0%
Yes — but pair enforcement funding with legal immigration reforms0%
No — redirect funds toward asylum processing and immigration courts0%
No — current enforcement funding is already sufficient0%