Elections & Democracy · Live

Should the Voting Rights Act require congressional maps to preserve majority-Black districts?

0 votes 237 voting nowDemo data 1 day ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

The Supreme Court on June 3, 2026 cleared the way for Alabama to use a congressional map containing one majority-Black district out of seven, in a state where Black residents make up roughly 27% of the population.

In Allen v. Milligan (2023), the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Alabama's prior map likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and ordered a second majority-Black or near-majority-Black district.

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits voting practices that result in discrimination based on race, color, or membership in a language minority group.

Supporters of majority-minority districts argue they are necessary to give Black voters an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice; opponents argue race-based districting is itself a form of racial classification the Constitution disfavors.

Control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the November 2026 midterms is expected to turn on a small number of seats, with redistricting outcomes in several Southern states among the contested factors.

Cast your vote
Should the Voting Rights Act require maps to preserve majority-Black districts?
Live
Live results — voters
Yes — Section 2 should require drawing majority-minority districts wherever demographics allow0%
Yes — but only when there is direct evidence of intentional racial discrimination0%
No — race should be a permitted factor but not a required one in redistricting0%
No — congressional maps should be drawn without reference to race0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Demo data
Once geographic aggregates ship, this section shows your state and the most dramatic agreement/disagreement around the country.
Virginia
55% Yes
Your state
Florida
51% No
leans opposite
Pennsylvania
53% Yes
close split
Michigan
57% Yes
strongest shift
Texas
54% No
disagrees
Georgia
50% Yes
nearly tied
Northeast
58% Yes
South
47% Yes
Midwest
54% Yes
West
61% Yes
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Live shifts
Demo data
Updating live
YES gained 4% nationally in the last hour as new votes surged from the Northeast.
1 hr
Florida flipped toward NO after trending narrowly YES earlier this afternoon.
18 min
1,248 new votes were submitted in the last 10 minutes.
Live
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Yes — Section 2 should require drawing majority-minority districts wherever demographics allow0%
Yes — but only when there is direct evidence of intentional racial discrimination0%
No — race should be a permitted factor but not a required one in redistricting0%
No — congressional maps should be drawn without reference to race0%