Political Glossary

CHIPS And Science Act

The CHIPS and Science Act is a 2022 federal law that authorized roughly $52 billion in subsidies and tax incentives to expand semiconductor research, design, and manufacturing in the United States. It also funded broader scientific research aimed at strengthening U.S. competitiveness with China and other countries.

Economy
Updated Jun 16, 2026
2 linked surveys
In plain English
Bringing computer chip production back home.

It's a 2022 law that puts tens of billions of federal dollars toward building computer chip factories and doing tech research inside the United States, rather than relying on overseas suppliers.

Simple example
Companies including Intel, TSMC, Micron, and Samsung have received CHIPS Act funding awards to build or expand semiconductor plants in states such as Arizona, Ohio, New York, and Texas.
Why it matters
What the term actually changes.
Supply Chain Security

Semiconductors power everything from cars and phones to weapons systems, and supporters say domestic production reduces U.S. dependence on factories concentrated in Asia.

Cost To Taxpayers

The law commits substantial federal spending and tax breaks, and debate continues over whether subsidies effectively boost U.S. industry or amount to corporate giveaways.

How it works
The mechanics, in practice.
Grants And Tax Credits

The Commerce Department reviews company applications and awards funding for new fabrication plants, while a 25% investment tax credit offsets manufacturing equipment costs.

Conditions On Recipients

Companies receiving funds face restrictions on expanding advanced chip production in China and must meet requirements on workforce, child care, and project milestones.

You’ve learned the term. Now vote.
Should the U.S. restrict trade with China for national-security reasons?
Live results — 53 voters
Yes — impose broad restrictions and decouple critical supply chains17%
Yes — but limit restrictions to specific technologies like semiconductors and AI40%
No — keep targeted export controls but preserve broader trade ties25%
No — open trade reduces conflict and benefits U.S. consumers19%
See how 53 Americans voted
Cast your vote to unlock the results
Anonymous · one vote per person