Traders, journalists and campaigns increasingly cite market prices alongside polling averages as a real-time signal of who is favored to win.
It's a marketplace where people bet real money on election outcomes, and the price of each contract reflects the crowd's best guess at the odds.
Large sums tied to election outcomes raise questions about whether participants could try to influence campaigns, voters or perceptions of momentum to move prices.
Each contract pays $1 if a specified event occurs and $0 if it does not, so a price of 60 cents implies the market sees a 60% chance of that outcome.
An exchange defines the question and resolution source, matches buyers and sellers, and pays out winners after official results are certified.
Courts, regulators and traders are reshaping a decades-old debate over whether Americans should be able to bet on election outcomes.
Read the guide →Federal courts, regulators and traders are testing whether Americans should be allowed to bet on the outcomes of their own elections.
Read the brief →