Because Congress approves them, compacts can override conflicting state laws and are enforced by the U.S. Supreme Court, which hears disputes between states directly.
It's a contract between states, blessed by Congress, that locks in how they'll share something like a river or handle a common issue.
Compacts govern water supplies, transportation networks, and environmental rules that affect drinking water, farming, and energy across millions of residents.
Compacts let states craft regional solutions, but federal interests such as treaties or environmental laws can complicate or override state-negotiated terms.
States draft and sign the agreement, then submit it to Congress for approval, which gives it federal legal status under the Compact Clause.
Water compacts typically use measured flows, delivery points, and accounting rules to determine each state's share, often adjusted for drought or surplus conditions.
When states disagree, they can sue one another directly in the U.S. Supreme Court, which may appoint a special master to recommend a ruling or settlement.
Interstate river water is governed by a layered system of state compacts, federal approval, and international treaties — a balance recently tested in the Rio Grande case.
Read the guide →A long-running Rio Grande dispute has reignited debate over how much authority states versus the federal government should hold over shared rivers.
Read the brief →