RCV is designed to ensure the winning candidate is supported by more than half of voters in the final round, rather than potentially winning with a small plurality in a crowded field.
Instead of picking just one candidate, you rank them 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so on. If nobody gets more than half the votes, last-place candidates are dropped and their voters' next picks are counted until someone wins a majority.
Supporters say it lets people vote for their true favorite without 'wasting' their vote, while critics say ranking multiple candidates adds complexity and can lead to ballots being discarded if all ranked choices are eliminated.
Voters mark candidates in order of preference instead of choosing only one. A candidate who wins a majority of first-choice votes is declared the winner immediately.
If no one has a majority, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated and those ballots are recounted using each voter's next-ranked choice. The process repeats until a candidate surpasses 50 percent.
A look at how ranked-choice voting works, where it is used, and what would have to happen for it to replace plurality voting in U.S. House, Senate, and presidential races.
Read the guide →Advocates say ranking candidates produces majority winners and broader appeal; opponents say the system adds complexity and delays without clear benefits.
Read the brief →