Stricter requirements can reduce caseloads and federal spending, while looser rules or waivers can expand access during economic downturns or in high-unemployment regions.
Work requirements mean some people have to prove they're working, training or volunteering a certain number of hours to keep getting benefits. The idea is to tie aid to workforce participation.
Supporters say the rules encourage employment and reduce long-term dependency; critics say paperwork burdens cause eligible people to lose benefits even when they are working.
Disputes over whether Washington can impose new conditions on states — like the 2024 lawsuit by 20 Democratic-led states — turn on how much flexibility states have in carrying out federal rules.
Recipients subject to requirements must document qualifying hours of work, job search or training and submit that information to state agencies on a regular schedule.
Those who don't meet the hours face benefit cutoffs after a set period, though exemptions exist for pregnancy, disability, caregiving and other circumstances defined by federal law.
States can request waivers from the USDA in areas with weak labor markets, and Congress can tighten or loosen rules through Farm Bill reauthorizations.
A look at how the nation's largest food-assistance program is run, and why federal conditions on it are fought in court.
Read the guide →A court fight over Trump administration rules has reopened a long-running debate about whether Washington should set tougher strings on food aid.
Read the brief →