Rights & Constitution · Live

Should colleges be allowed to consider race in admissions?

0 votes 237 voting nowDemo data 16 days ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

In June 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and 6-2 in the companion UNC case that race-conscious admissions policies violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Court's 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger had previously allowed colleges to consider race as one factor among many to achieve the educational benefits of diversity.

Supporters of race-conscious admissions argue it helps address historical inequities and produces educational benefits from diverse student bodies; opponents argue it constitutes discrimination against applicants of other races, particularly Asian American applicants in the Harvard case.

Nine states, including California (1996) and Michigan (2006), banned race-conscious admissions at public universities through ballot initiatives prior to the 2023 ruling.

Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion stated that universities may still consider 'an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life,' but not race itself as a categorical factor.

Cast your vote
Should colleges be allowed to consider race in admissions?
Live
Live results — voters
Yes — race should be a permitted factor to promote diversity0%
Yes — but only as one minor factor among many0%
No — but socioeconomic background should be considered instead0%
No — admissions should be based only on academic and individual merit0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Demo data
Once geographic aggregates ship, this section shows your state and the most dramatic agreement/disagreement around the country.
Virginia
55% Yes
Your state
Florida
51% No
leans opposite
Pennsylvania
53% Yes
close split
Michigan
57% Yes
strongest shift
Texas
54% No
disagrees
Georgia
50% Yes
nearly tied
Northeast
58% Yes
South
47% Yes
Midwest
54% Yes
West
61% Yes
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Live shifts
Demo data
Updating live
YES gained 4% nationally in the last hour as new votes surged from the Northeast.
1 hr
Florida flipped toward NO after trending narrowly YES earlier this afternoon.
18 min
1,248 new votes were submitted in the last 10 minutes.
Live
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Yes — race should be a permitted factor to promote diversity0%
Yes — but only as one minor factor among many0%
No — but socioeconomic background should be considered instead0%
No — admissions should be based only on academic and individual merit0%