Rights & Constitution · Live

Should religious organizations be exempt from anti-discrimination laws in hiring?

0 votes 237 voting nowDemo data 16 days ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, but contains an exemption allowing religious organizations to prefer co-religionists in hiring.

In Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC (2012), the Supreme Court unanimously recognized a 'ministerial exception' barring anti-discrimination suits by employees who perform religious functions.

In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (2020), the Court expanded the ministerial exception 7-2 to cover lay teachers at religious schools whose duties included religious instruction.

Supporters of broader exemptions argue the First Amendment's Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses bar government interference in religious staffing decisions.

Critics argue expansive exemptions can leave workers — including those in healthcare, education, and social services funded partly by taxpayers — without protection against discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, or disability.

Cast your vote
Should religious organizations be exempt from anti-discrimination laws in hiring?
Live
Live results — voters
Yes — religious groups should have full hiring autonomy under the First Amendment0%
Yes — but only for clergy and roles tied directly to religious teaching0%
No — but allow limited exemptions for houses of worship0%
No — religious employers should follow the same anti-discrimination laws as all employers0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Demo data
Once geographic aggregates ship, this section shows your state and the most dramatic agreement/disagreement around the country.
Virginia
55% Yes
Your state
Florida
51% No
leans opposite
Pennsylvania
53% Yes
close split
Michigan
57% Yes
strongest shift
Texas
54% No
disagrees
Georgia
50% Yes
nearly tied
Northeast
58% Yes
South
47% Yes
Midwest
54% Yes
West
61% Yes
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Live shifts
Demo data
Updating live
YES gained 4% nationally in the last hour as new votes surged from the Northeast.
1 hr
Florida flipped toward NO after trending narrowly YES earlier this afternoon.
18 min
1,248 new votes were submitted in the last 10 minutes.
Live
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters say the court was right.
Yes — religious groups should have full hiring autonomy under the First Amendment0%
Yes — but only for clergy and roles tied directly to religious teaching0%
No — but allow limited exemptions for houses of worship0%
No — religious employers should follow the same anti-discrimination laws as all employers0%