Rights & Constitution · Live

Should the DOJ subpoena reporters to unmask their sources?

0 votes 1 hr ago Cast your vote to see the split
The facts

On July 11, 2026, the New York Times reported that the DOJ subpoenaed several of its journalists to testify before a federal grand jury about their Air Force One story.

The underlying article detailed security concerns tied to a Boeing 747 donated by Qatar for use as a presidential aircraft.

The First Amendment does not explicitly protect reporters from grand jury subpoenas, per the Supreme Court's 1972 Branzburg v. Hayes ruling.

There is no federal shield law; 49 states and DC offer some journalist-source protection, but Congress has never passed a national version.

In 2021, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a policy barring the DOJ from seizing reporters' records in leak investigations, a rule the current administration has moved to loosen.

Cast your vote
Should the DOJ subpoena reporters to unmask their sources?
Live
Live results — voters
No — press freedom means reporters don't rat out sources0%
Yes — national security leaks demand accountability0%
See live results from live voters
Cast your vote to unlock America’s reaction
Anonymous · one vote per person
You vs America
You matched the majority.
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters agree with you.
Your vote
VS
America
How states are voting
Not enough votes yet to show state-level results — check back as more people vote.
Compare with people like you?
Optional: pick how you describe yourself politically to unlock sharper anonymous comparisons.
Full results — votes
Your vote lines up with the current national reaction: most voters agree with you.
No — press freedom means reporters don't rat out sources0%
Yes — national security leaks demand accountability0%